Accuracy and accountability

Corrections, Challenges & Right of Reply

We welcome evidence that challenges our reporting and will examine genuine concerns fairly.

Our work separates archived source material, independently verifiable findings and labelled editorial commentary. Automatically generated transcripts can contain misheard words or names and must not, by themselves, be treated as conclusive evidence of wrongdoing.

How to challenge something

Send the page link, the precise statement you dispute, what you believe is wrong or missing, and documents or other evidence that support your position. Please include an email address for a response.

Email a correction or right of reply

What happens next?

We review the evidence and context. If a factual statement is wrong, we will correct it promptly. Unsupported material may be withdrawn or removed. If the finding remains supported, we may keep it and publish an appropriate clarification or response. Substantive corrections should be dated; we retain an internal audit trail.

Raising a challenge does not guarantee deletion of accurate, supported reporting. Where a credible serious concern is raised, we may temporarily restrict the disputed item while reviewing it.

Authenticity and source standards

We seek original court records and independent corroboration regardless of who shares a document. A screenshot, social-media article or circulating PDF is not automatically an authenticated court record. We will identify disputes about document authenticity rather than state contested allegations as proven.

We do not knowingly publish sealed court materials or unnecessary sensitive personal information. Contact us to report safety or privacy concerns.

This policy is an editorial commitment, not a guarantee of legal immunity or legal advice.